The chart below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003
The given charts illustrate how the energy which produced from dissimilar sources changed in a country over a period of 18 years starting from 1985.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that there was a slight change in the percentage of some energy when oil and nuclear power dropped while the amount of natural gas, coal and other renewable energy surged noticeable between 1985 and 2003. Meanwhile, the percentage of hydro which was produced in a country stayed unchanged.
Over a period of 18 years, the most popular major was still oil, which accounted for more than half in 1985 and plunged sharply to about two-fifths in 2003. There was a dramatic decline which occured in the proportion of nuclear power from 22% in 1985 to 8% in 2003. A 18-year period also witnessed a stability in the percentage of hydro energy for 4%.
Natural gas and coal energy was produced approximately throughout 18 years and surged slightly from 8% to 22% for the proportion of gas and from 13% to 23% in the amount of coal power. The least remarkable power was other renewable ones, which accounted for 1% in 1985 and jumped slightly to 4% in 2004
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...r power from 22% in 1985 to 8% in 2003. A 18-year period also witnessed a stabili...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76616915423 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55261215544 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9882799782 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283134835965 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137266044847 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905164031473 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204969474821 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753756896051 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.