The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the patterns of worldwide food and oil costs and changes that happened between the years 2000 and 2011.
Overall It can be seen that in the beginning, both items started with almost similar prices, and in the end, food prices overtook the oil.
Firstly, the cost of edible items in the year 2000 was at 90 points. Further, from 2000 till 2007, there was a gradual increase in the price index with 140 points maximum. Moreover, In 2008, the cost of consumables raised significantly and reached 220 points. After that, by the end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009, the cost started falling rapidly and stopped at 140 points. Lastly, after mid-2010, It can be identified that the value of food items reached its peak and rested at massive 240 points.
On the other hand, Oil products in 2008, started selling at almost 30 dollars per barrel. At the same time, In the coming years until 2007, the growth was continuous but slow. Crossing the year 2007, again the price started hiking and these time very fastly, followed by the instant dip in the year 2008 with 50$ per barrel. In the last phase, it ended with 100$ per barrel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-09 | Awadhesh Mourya | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | mrinal | 82 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | ngango56 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | hoangvu0601 | 100 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | nick surya | 61 | view |
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Pollution of rivers lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment What are the possible causes of water pollution and what effects does this have on animal life and human society 84
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 78
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the end, food prices overtook the oil. Firstly, the cost of edible items in the...
^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$50'.
Suggestion: $50
...y the instant dip in the year 2008 with 50$ per barrel. In the last phase, it ended...
^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
...arrel. In the last phase, it ended with 100$ per barrel.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67156862745 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19048548126 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0593578902 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6363636364 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113207952331 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493242900798 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075919440203 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108064286829 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982931490497 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the end, food prices overtook the oil. Firstly, the cost of edible items in the...
^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$50'.
Suggestion: $50
...y the instant dip in the year 2008 with 50$ per barrel. In the last phase, it ended...
^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
...arrel. In the last phase, it ended with 100$ per barrel.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67156862745 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19048548126 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0593578902 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6363636364 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113207952331 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493242900798 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075919440203 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108064286829 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982931490497 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.