Technology has changed human relationships do you think it's positive or negative
The impact of technology on the relatioships which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this has now sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years.in my opinion the technology came as a boon for many. This esaay will further elaborate my views for favouring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
Analysing the statement and explaining further, the first and foremost reason is that technology has made world a contracted ball.where each and any can communicate with their relatives and friends form anywhere to everywhere.which helps to strengthen the bond of any relation. Another striking benefit in this regard is that not only people can connect with the people they know but can connect with the people they don't know.for example there are so many matrimonial websites where people can find their mates easily and it is seen that relationships are successful.
Probing ahead, one of the main underlying reason stems from the fact is that today work pressure and sedentary jobs oblige people to stay at their homes and hence making it difficult for them to give time to family and friends.moreover, it is pertinent to mention that it could only be made possible because of technology.
To cap it up, iassert that technology has made it possible in everyway not only to stay connected with loved ones but establishing new relationships also.
- You have a full time job and you are also doing a part time evening course You now find that you cannot continue the course Write a letter to your teachers In your letter describe the situation explain why you cannot continue at this time say what action 73
- Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all times What are the advantages for a company having a uniform Are there any benefits for having a uniform for the staff 73
- Some people believe that mobile phone conversations should be banned in crowded and social places Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 91
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Last year you met someone on holiday and became friends He she has informed you that they will be travelling near to your home town on business in a few months time Write a letter to your friend inviting them to stay with you In your letter say how please 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The impact of technology on the relatioships which was always debatable ...
^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his notion. The substantial influence of this has now sparked the controversy ove...
^^
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ow but can connect with the people they dont know.for example there are so many matr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ones but establishing new relationships also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09920634921 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88782849455 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599206349206 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4374088921 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.571428571 106.682146367 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 20.7667163134 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0705430917895 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369360812706 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250272787056 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0455766601603 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326542634918 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.