" In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. "
The one who is averred as a hero is always going through media scrutiny. The prompt that it is impossible for a society to regard any person as a hero for a long time is contentious. Some may regard that it is no longer possible for people to keep their reputation untarnished forever. On the other side of the coin, such scrutiny, even if it reveals some unpleasant about an idol of the public, does not necessarily lead to disregarding him/her as a hero.
Some people believe that nowadays, media delve into the personal life of the idol of the public. They will even publicize the hero's closet whether that is allowed or not. To shed more light, everyone has their good as well as a bad entity in their life; Media, on the other side, avail that crucial information of them by disseminating it. Accordingly, when the public gets to know about these negative parts, they start to judge you and juxtapose those positive idols and ignore you, resulting in marring their reputation.
However, while it is true - ugly facts diminish the reputation of a public person, it is not always the same case. First of all, today, people are accustomed to the so-called " shocking discoveries". Also, the divorce of celebrity to their spouse, affairs with someone is commonplace. Nobody these days gets surprised by drinking, and the like habit of an idol. Sometimes minor flaws can augment the people's reputation. For instance, a pop star struggling from his drug-addicted life and now doing the consummate performance in his life will get more empathy and respect toward them.
Moreover, most of the people are averred as a hero by the publicizing of the media. Not only do they report the ugly fact of the people, but also they distribute the positive fact of the people which indeed aggrandize the reputation of people. To further elucidate the positive sway of media coverage, the poor people from rural areas with a congenital aptitude and flair are exposed to the whole mass of the nation which results in an increase in his popularity and fandom.
To draw a line, the media scrutiny of a hero does not always subside his reputation. Not every negative fact ruins one's reputation. Besides, people often choose to ignore those ugly facts about their idols.
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 50
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'regards'.
Suggestion: regards
...or a long time is contentious. Some may regard that it is no longer possible for peopl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
.... Sometimes minor flaws can augment the peoples reputation. For instance, a pop star st...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...om his drug-addicted life and now doing the consummate performance in his life will get more e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...putation. Not every negative fact ruins ones reputation. Besides, people often choos...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84061696658 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66666789941 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557840616967 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2796799907 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.15 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141118403733 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474722246732 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712723515045 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852974777057 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948564625584 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.