Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?.
Nowadays people in different nations are argueing that normal people can't help with betterment of the environment. Only the government authorities and unicorn companies can make the difference. Whereas I agree with the above statement and the following reasons are explained below.
On the first hand, as the world is developing and people are now financially stable the demand of various goods and service's around the world has grown significantly. To fulfill the requirement's of people, government-affiliated firm's as well as high end companie's are trying to cope up with the supplies. Further, While achiving their target's these firm's pollute their surrounding environment more and more. To overcome such issues, the government can impose different laws with respect to variou's polluting sectors. Big companies can hire a team to upgrade their way of manufacturing to minimise the toxic waste generated while producing. For example, the Indian government inform the big automobile manufacturing player's to update their engine's as per the government emission norm's to limit the air pollution.
On the other hand, Individual people can create awarness amongst the society with respect to the materials which can harm the atmosphere. Also, they can motivate people to use the 3R rule ( Reduce, Recycle, Reduce) in their day to day life to bring change. Also, people can segregate their waste and dump the harmful waste seperately so that the harmful waste can be stopped from going into the ordinary landfill's. For instance, people in Swedan has implimanted the latter process of dumping their waste according to its catogary and now not a single waste harmful waste goe into their landfill.
To conclude, I would say that, to bring a change the major players who is majorly responsible for the environment degradation can bring change by following the environment laws. At the same time, Individual people can also do their best on their level to creat a balance in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problem m 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inclu 78
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007
- Today family members do not eat meals together Why does this happen Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nations are argueing that normal people cant help with betterment of the environment...
^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y can motivate people to use the 3R rule Reduce, Recycle, Reduce in their day to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, as well as, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24528301887 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87207302296 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0642410725 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220118948331 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819908272413 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073309571846 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14089002068 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311174772053 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nations are argueing that normal people cant help with betterment of the environment...
^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y can motivate people to use the 3R rule Reduce, Recycle, Reduce in their day to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, as well as, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24528301887 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87207302296 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0642410725 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220118948331 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819908272413 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073309571846 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14089002068 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311174772053 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.