Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is appreciated that studying with a student group at school is far more advantageous than online learning from home. From my perspective, I genuinely agree with this opinion. In this essay, I would pen down valid justifications for my verdict.
Initially, I opine that studying with a group of students at school surpasses distance education regarding students' mental health. This is mainly derived from the fact that online studying includes no direct interactions. This would exert pernicious impacts on the friendship between learners and their mental state. Meanwhile, when being at school, pupils can easily communicate with their counterparts, thus lessening the gap between them. According to recent research by the Ministry of Education and Training in Vietnam, almost 85% of online learners feel isolated and hard to make friends while offline learners comprise only 16%. Should students could have learning experiences in the area of educational institutions, these mental problems might be curbed.
Moreover, I hold a strong belief that studying in a classroom would be better than in online classes in terms of boosting learning efficiency. This is mainly attributed to the fact that strict regulations and direct supervision can act as a deterrent to cheating and force students to channel their effort into studying. By contrast, while having online classes at home, students can do multi-tasking, such as playing games and texting simultaneously. These activities can distract them from acquiring insights into knowledge. Therefore, having offline lessons is more efficient than online ones as students can be more concentrated on learning.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home, particularly in mental health and learning efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- In most parts of the world the volume of traffic is growing at an alarming rate In the form of an assignment discuss the main traffic problems in your country their causes and possible solutions 89
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- More companies have opened working areas without walls or barriers on their desks Do the disadvantages of open plan offices outweigh the advantages 84
- People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this 78
- Some people think that governments should do more to make their citizens eat a healthy diet Others however believe that individuals must take responsibility for their own diet and health Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55017301038 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06122594285 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553633217993 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4409220826 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.933333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388887538098 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13233629447 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142934853851 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285874319178 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113977967996 0.056905535591 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.