Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is appreciated that studying with a student group at school is far more advantageous than online learning from home. From my perspective, I genuinely agree with this opinion. In this essay, I would pen down valid justifications for my verdict.
Initially, I opine that studying with a group of students at school surpasses distance education regarding students' mental health. This is mainly derived from the fact that online studying includes no direct interactions. This would exert pernicious impacts on the friendship between learners and their mental state. Meanwhile, when being at school, pupils can easily communicate with their counterparts, thus strengthening the bond between them. According to recent research by the Ministry of Education and Training in Vietnam, almost 85% of online learners feel isolated and hard to make friends after a long quarantine with virtual classes. Should students could have learning experiences in the area of educational institutions, these mental problems might be curbed.
Moreover, I hold a strong belief that studying in a classroom would be better than in online classes in terms of boosting academic efficiency. This is mainly attributed to the fact that strict regulations and direct supervision can act as a deterrent to cheating and force students to channel their effort into studying. By contrast, while having online classes at home, students can do multi-tasking, such as playing games and texting simultaneously. These activities can distract them from acquiring insights into knowledge. Therefore, having offline lessons would boost academic performance more than online ones as students can be more concentrated on learning.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home, particularly in mental health and learning efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals health than consuming ready meals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- More companies have opened working areas without walls or barriers on their desks Do the disadvantages of open plan offices outweigh the advantages 61
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The table shows the changing value which China achieved by exporting five types of goods over the two years of 2009 and 2010 measured in billion dollars 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58219178082 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09366206627 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9491564622 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386290656135 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13051668949 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141015200062 0.0667982634062 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282440891961 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11461586743 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.