In many countries, government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
In this day and age, more and more public attention has been placed on developing internet access speed with a huge amount of local authorities’ money. There are several factors leading to improve the internet and I agree that it is not the most suitable use of government money.
There are several reasons why the government spends a large amount of money in order to enhance the quality of technology. The main reason for this issue is that the internet is a tool for people to entertain and study. In fact, both adults and students can expand their knowledge and relieve stress through watching useful videos on the internet quickly. Pupils can self-study the helpful knowledge online in order not to waste money having extra classes. Adults can have referred to good ideas related to their jobs with modern technology to accomplish their assignments perfectly. Take myself as an example, 2 years ago, I often researched the knowledge in the textbooks through the internet before going to class at school; therefore, I had been praised by my teachers for my improvement in my studies. Another important reason contributing to this phenomenon is that citizens can keep in touch with others. Specifically, they can stay in touch with people living far away from home by using social apps on the internet. Take my sister as an example, she has a best friend who lives far from home, she and her best friend have kept in touch for 6 years through social apps such as zalo or facebook.
I strongly believe that it is not the most appropriate use of government money. Firstly, modern technology is now enough to meet human needs. This is because people can utilize the internet with high speed and they can do everything they want with high precision and fast speed. Take my father as an example, due to the covid 19 pandemic about 1 year ago, my father had to hold important meetings online on electronic devices and he was unlikely to wait a minute because the speed of the internet was extremely fast. Secondly, there is another problem to deal with. To be more specific, we need to have a huge amount of government money to purchase good services and construct hospitals in order to treat diseases. Take my village as an example, there are many people with covid 19 outside community in my village, we need local authorities’ money to build isolation places and hospitals to be able to treat covid 19 and improve human health.
In conclusion, there are two main factors for government to improve internet access, and I trust this is not the most optimal way to spend money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | nguyễn nga | 61 | view |
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 59
- the graphs give information about TV shows screened in HN and HCM City from 1976 to 2006 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that school should teach foreign language for primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1064, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
.... Take my sister as an example, she has a best friend who lives far from home, sh...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 448.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76339285714 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56696040372 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488839285714 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2448362374 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.315789474 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5789473684 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261834143036 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993648089745 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119326405192 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212048754829 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708226399256 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.