Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that governments from all over the world should allocate money and employ all possible resources for the protection of wildlife. Although I understand why some people think that it is a waste of time and money to protect these animals, I believe that we should spend more time and money protecting wild animals.
Some people think that human beings have spent too much time and resources protecting wild animals, and they may have some reasons for that. Firstly, they may think that other sections, such as the economy, healthcare, and politics, are important and even urgent, and governments should spend money and time on them. For example, many countries are now facing a famine crisis. Why don’t we save human lives first before saving wild animals? Secondly, some wild animals and birds still become extinct no matter how hard we try to save them, so why don’t we spend time and resources on doing something more meaningful?
However, I believe that we should spend more time and resources protecting wild animals and birds. Governments in almost all countries around the globe have enacted laws to protect wild animals for a long time, and they may have some reasons for that. There have been many strict laws to protect wild animals, such as people being put in jail if they capture and raise endangered animals unilegally. This means that wild animals are very important to human lives. Personally, I think that wild animals and birds play a role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem. Because all creatures interact with each other to survive in many ways, such as the interaction of prey and predators, which means that these pieces eat one another to survive. If we hadn’t spent enough time saving endangered animals, some species could be on the verge of extinction due to interuption of the food chain. This may result in the death of plants in the forest, and the environment could be threatened.
In conclusion, although there might be some reasons to justify not protecting wild animals, I believe that we should do whatever we can to protect them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | Mina__ | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | nguyentru1993 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | Komaldeep | 26 | view |
- Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 10
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9323943662 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4737206372 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467605633803 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6396370661 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3084350408 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113557779908 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826281141443 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207791133085 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453627195691 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9323943662 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4737206372 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467605633803 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6396370661 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3084350408 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113557779908 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826281141443 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207791133085 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453627195691 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.