Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Wild animal species’s extinction is one of the most pressing global problems, and many protection practices have been implemented to tackle this issues. While some people argue this exceeds our needed, I hold a different perspective and believe that we should dedicate more effort to protect animals.
On the one hand, international governments as well as animals protection organizations, in recent decades, have spent a significant of money in an attempt to preserve wilds animals and birds, especially those who are rare and in great danger of extinction. This could also take a lot of time and effort since requiring cooperation of individuals who partly contribute to animal’s extinction beside climate change and others indirect causes. Despite making every possible efforts, this problem is still a major concern,as the results, those who are not advocates of animal protection policies contend that we are wasting our resources and instead, government should spent money and time on other potential aspects such as education, medication or serious social issues like povery and crime, which have significant impact on people’s lives and always needed supports.
Nevertheless, regardless of critics, preserving animals is a compulsory tasks and governments and organizations must try their best in the war against animals and bird extinction. This is because each specie plays a vital role in balancing the biodiversity, and only one dissapear could negatively affect other animals in surround areas, and the extinction of a wide range animals can be a disasters for human who traditionally depends on animals for their survival. In addition, They are also potential resources in certain aspects, for example in medicine or scientific researches, proving that we cannot ignore their disappearance. In fact many areas has experience remarkable decline in population of wild animals and birds in recent years, and many of them have totally died out. This actually shown that our preservation is insufficient and ineffective instead of being too much as some argue, therefore more appropriate approachs should be taken and more effort should be given.
In conclusion, we cannot stopped protecting animals due their significant importance on our lives. Government investments on this sectors, in my opinion, should be distributed more evenly to ensure animals from all parts of worlds are in control. Again, I assume that resoures spent on preserving animal are worthwhile and will never be too much if we utilize it effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | Mina__ | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | nguyentru1993 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | Komaldeep | 26 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in everyday life Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a different perspective and believe that we should dedicate more effort to protec...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dicate more effort to protect animals. On the one hand, international governme...
^^
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to protect animals. On the one hand, international governments as well as ani...
^^
Line 2, column 521, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...s, this problem is still a major concern,as the results, those who are not advocate...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le’s lives and always needed supports. Nevertheless, regardless of critics, pre...
^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a disaster' or simply 'disasters'?
Suggestion: a disaster; disasters
...tinction of a wide range animals can be a disasters for human who traditionally depends on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...on our lives. Government investments on this sectors, in my opinion, should be distr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44050632911 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99122682366 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589873417722 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.887462025 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.307692308 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3846153846 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21840725687 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803896197142 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327046234911 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137524637444 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119772071063 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.