It is true that foreign films are more popular than domestically produced films. There are several reasons why this phenomenon has occurred.
In my opinion we need three important elements to make a good film. These factors include creativity, talent, and budget. If you put all the right elements together, you can actually make a movie that will appeal to the largest possible audience. Foreign film producers and directors are willing to take the risk when it comes to creating new, whereas local film makers are still creating the same type of content. A producer’s primary task is choosing good film crews including famous director, professional sound recorder and other film crews. When it comes to creativity local productions are not even close to overseas’. In foreign film industries especial western, there are many talented actors and actress that play in high quality. Despite many talented people of all ages, local film directors use repetitive individuals who have only good face. Producer should substitute new talented players with old ones who can not play new roles or new characters. For instance, “Amin Hayaee” is one of my favorite actors has played similarly since his famous film that was named “Akhrajiha”. His movement, make up, even his walking has been constant without any changing. Being up date is an inherent challenge for any individual; I think he must be retirement. Iranian writers and producers have a book like a cookbook and they are just repeating the recipes again and again.
Local film industries are in deep crisis, there are common themes that both filmmakers and actors return to time and time again. To accomplish great things, we must not only have talent but also Money that, playing main role to each industry. We can not deny the fact Budgets of local films can not compare with huge budget foreign films. They invest a lot of money to create fantastic movies difference from previously products. We do not have this opportunity. In my view, government should give financial support for this field. Based on data, South Korea could make a lot of money from sell entertainments. Governments can raise GDP (one of the economy variable) by investing in this industry and income from sales. They can identify talented people and give them scholarship to study overseas, specially the US being pioneer in this filed. End of all, I think film maker can use foreign actors and actress. Using them is a revolutionary idea, but it will be expensive.
In conclusion, I believe that financial aid can promote local films that can compete with others even Hollywood that dominate of this industry.
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of money 84
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.the graph below gives information about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 73
- The graph shows consumption of energy in the U S since 1980 with projections through 2030 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al sound recorder and other film crews. When it comes to creativity local production...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, similarly, so, still, whereas, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04328018223 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65337039014 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583143507973 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2640859886 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2592592593 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85185185185 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393888667128 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955072923031 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788594812215 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243477411686 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406709924111 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.