Essay question: Some believe that cultural traditions will be destroyed by the money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others think it is the only way to save these cultural traditions. Discuss both views and show your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words. *
Nowadays, some people believed that the culture will be affected negatively when people try to make profits from the traditions’ attractive while others are of the opinion that that tourism strategy is the only way to save our cultural values. From my perspective, I strongly agree with the latter opinion.
On the one hand, the opinion about how attracting tourists by cultural traditions can be harmful to the national culture is supported by some obvious reasons. Firstly, the commercialization of traditional values can lead to the perversion of customs. For instance, traditional rituals in some removed areas can be used by local travel companies to make money and become negatively superstitious services. In a long-term concern, this trend will affect the youngers’ perception about traditional customs. Secondly, having seen the benefits of attracting tourists with traditional culture, many people who did not have professional acknowledgment about the customs and traditions still spread those values as their main job. Thus, it will cause the cultural transmission to be incorrect, and contribute to fading the important values within the pass-on traditions.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why people firmly believe that developing cultural tourism is the only way to save these cultural traditions. First of all, profits gained from tourists can be used to restore historical relics or invest in preserving and developing intangible cultural values. In fact, without these sources of revenue, a range of historical sites all over the world have degraded or even disappeared. Moreover, tourism can not only be the source for saving cultural heritage but also can be a major source of income helping many local people to have such a long stable life.
To sum up, I have serious aggression that tourism is the optimal way to preserve and develop the precious cultural heritage and traditions. However, these money-making attractions must have long-term planning to ensure that they cannot adversely affect cultural traditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-27 | fiwefhiweu | 73 | view |
- The visuals give information about the number of spacecraft launched by various national governments between 1957 and 2007 and the purpose of each mission 91
- The chart below shows the results of a recent survey into the causes of poor school attendance in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The information below shows the number of customers and the number of popular fruits purchased in one greengrocer s in England over one summer weekend 78
- The chart below shows the results of a recent survey into the causes of poor school attendance in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1018 and 2011 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in fact, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92574109201 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553125 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4276729471 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327059582408 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119733613477 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846534156778 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209745278549 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054860920158 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.