The charts below show the most popular films by genre for men and women and general ticket sales for different types of film in the USA in 2010. Summarize the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart gives information about the most popular movies by category for men and women, while the pie chart illustrates how much money was spent on different kinds of films in the USA in the year 2010.
In general, the most popular type of film for men was action, while women were likely to watch romantic comedies the most. Tickets of action movies were the highest sold, in contrast to other kinds of movies such as science fiction and western.
In the bar graph, it was obvious that men tended to choose action movies and this number was nearly twice as many as the women. Women had a tendency to watch romantic comedies, while just 5% of men watched this kind of movie. The number of men watching comedy and western movies was the same as the number of women. When thriller and science fiction movies were taken into consideration, more men watched these films than women.
In the pie chart, nearly a half of ticket sales were action movies. Ranked in second place were comedy movies with 24% of the ticket sales. Next came the romantic movies when just 12% of tickets were sold. One out of tenth percent of ticket sales were thriller movies. In the last place were other films such as science fiction and western with only 5% of the tickets sold.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-02 | Đặng Luân | 61 | view |
| 2017-12-30 | zuga | 82 | view |
| 2017-12-30 | zuga | 84 | view |
| 2017-06-22 | Huyen Trang | 93 | view |
| 2017-06-22 | Huyen Trang | 74 | view |
- The graphs below show the unemployment rate of citizens in the US with a further classification displaying average salary per week in 2005 Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- A study shows that a lot of children from the age 7 to 11 spend too much time watching television or playing video games How do you think this problem influences the children their families and the society What measures should be taken to solve it 67
- Most people think that the Internet is good others think that its disadvantages are more important What is your opinion Talking about the advantages and disadvantages of the Internet 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, in contrast, in general, kind of, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56387665198 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03987115929 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480176211454 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3241836907 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223944095865 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946522003602 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890592714972 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169902005938 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765627339759 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.