some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
When the issue of public transport fee comes into view, there exist conflicting opinions. Many people believe that it is the government’s responsibility to fund mass transit so everyone can have access to it without charge. From my perspective, there is no need for the government to subsidize these fees for the following reasons.
The first reason is that the government cannot cover all the fees. In other words, if the authority funds public transport, it has to involve many kinds of payment, ranging from employment to maintenance costs. Besides, there are many other fields which also need financial support from the government, especially science and education; as a result, once the government decides to support this industry, it may stand the risk of being under financial pressure. Take China as an illustration. This country’s government funded public transport with an aim to make it accessible to everyone in 2008; however, a few months later, it had to cut this funding due to the economic crisis. This example directly suggests that the expense on public transport may become an economic pressure for the government once it sponsors this industry.
Another justification is that the service and quality of public transport will not be guaranteed. To be more specific, the government has to care for many things; hence, if it supports this industry financially, it can only fund a small amount of money. However, this money cannot make sure of the service and sanitary; thus, buses and trains may become dirty and overcrowded. This may lead to the fact that fewer people will choose to commute by public transports; therefore, private companies and businesses should invest in these transports so that its quality can be guaranteed. Consequently, residents should pay for the public transports’ fees so as to maintain the high-quality of these transports.
In conclusion, the government should not fund the public transports; instead, the residents should pay money in order to guarantee the service and the cleanliness of the mass transit.
- The diagram below shows the making a storage area from a material called concrete canvas 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 78
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give 47
- The charts below give information about weather in two Brazilian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- A study shows that a lot of children from the age 7 to 11 spend too much time watching television or playing video games How do you think this problem influences the children their families and the society What measures should be taken to solve it 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all amount of money. However, this money cannot make sure of the service and sani...
^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uld pay for the public transports’ fees so as to maintain the high-quality of these tran...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22891566265 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92582615722 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53313253012 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3320654249 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304758837641 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101511608287 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064054153828 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180149107322 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534172591906 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all amount of money. However, this money cannot make sure of the service and sani...
^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uld pay for the public transports’ fees so as to maintain the high-quality of these tran...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22891566265 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92582615722 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53313253012 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3320654249 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304758837641 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101511608287 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064054153828 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180149107322 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534172591906 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.