The bar graph reveals how many females per 100 male students attended various school levels in two separate categories of developing and developed countries during a 10-year-periods from 1990 to 2000, with a prediction until 2005. Overall, there was a significant difference between the genders' enrolments in developed countries and developing ones. Additionally, the category of “boys” always outnumbered that of “girls” except for the female's number who enrolled in tertiary school.
In terms of the category of developing countries, the higher the educational levels get, the fewer number of girls engaged in this. To be exact, this figure witnessed a downward trend from the average of 85 female students per 100 male students to 77 girls per 100 boys and to approximately 71 females per 100 males who enrolled in the primary, secondary and tertiary schools respectively. However, it can be seen that there was a slight growth in the figure for developing countries from 1990 to 2000 with its value increased by about 8 females at each education level.
An opposite pattern occurred in the number of enrolled students in developed countries. Regarding the category of primary and secondary schools, these figures grew from 93 to 96 girls per 100 boys for the former and from 98 to 99 females per 100 males for the latter from 1990 to 2000. Noticeably, the number of girls who engaged in tertiary school was higher than that of boys, at over 100 females compared with 100 males in these years surveyed. In addition, it is projected that there will be no gender gap in all education levels in the year 2005.
- The pie charts above show the comparison of the proportion of energy produced by different sources in an European country in 1995 and 2005 80
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on diferent items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01481481481 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79413455808 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507407407407 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5189489613 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201880034824 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095024994293 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399903701597 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161664025993 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297810986619 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.