The table below gives information on consumer spending on diferent items in five different countries in 2002
The table reveals the expenditure on various products in five different countries in the year 2002. Overall, spending on the category of Food/Drink/Tobacco was by far the highest while that on Leisure/Education was the lowest over the time surveyed.
Regarding Food/Drink/Tobacco, it can be seen that there was a significant difference between the rate of money spent on Turkey and Sweden. To be exact, the figure for Turkey doubled that for Sweden, 32.14% as opposed to 15.77%, taking the first position among all countries. The three remaining countries followed with lower values, 29.91% for Ireland’s, 18.8% for Spain’s and 16.36% for Italy’s expenditure.
By contrast, the lowest spending can be seen in the category of Leisure/Education. In details, the Turkey’s figure was over twice the Spain’s one, 4.35% in comparison with 1.98%. Additionally, Italian, Swedish and Irish spent negligible values on this item, making up just under 3.2% each on average.
In terms of Clothing/Footwear, Italy possessed the highest expenditure, being more 4.6% than the lowest one, Sweden, 9% compared with 5.4%. The figure for Ireland, Spain and Turkey was nearly identical, accounting for 6.43%, 6.51% and 6.63% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 87
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Some people say that it is possible for a county to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Others disagree Discuss both view and give your opinion
- The chart shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to a university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or 6.43%, 6.51% and 6.63% respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35483949985 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.100947846 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102038746237 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049185614738 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853043192213 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709743576513 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075656501911 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.