The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table reveals the consumption of various products which people in five different countries spent money on in the year 2002, measured in the unit of percentage. Overall, the category of Food/Drink/Tobacco was by far the highest spending while that of Leisure/Education was the lowest over the time surveyed.
It can be seen that people in Turkey spent much greater than others on the two categories of Food/Drink/Tobacco and Leisure/Education, standing at 32.14% and 4.35% respectively. This was followed by the figure for Ireland, consisting of 3.22% lower than that for Turkey in Food/Drink/Tobacco and 2.14% in Leisure/Education. Noticeably, the top spending on Clothing/Footwear belonged to Italy, accounting for the rate at 9%.
Regarding the remaining countries, the expenditure on Spain and Sweden experienced a negligible value. To be exact, the proportion of these two countries was lower among the total consumption in terms of Food/Drink/Tobacco, at just 15.77% and 18.8% respectively. Additionally, consumers in Spain and Sweden who spent on two remaining goods were lower than others, making up just under the average of 7% for Clothing/Footwear and 4% for Leisure/Education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal of more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your opinion 80
- The the diagram below show the stages and equipment used in cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58241758242 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.00359094942 2.65546596893 151% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7520324532 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100573447686 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047945383456 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784914068948 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831932337295 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825426063371 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.