Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Thanks to the advancement of the world, there are now plenty of alternative ways to acquire knowledge. Therefore, it is said that studying collectively with other students is more profitable than learning distantly via modern gadgets. In my opinion, I strongly support this statement.
On the one hand, it is understandable that learning online can offer some benefits for both students and teachers. Firstly, it is now more straightforward for students to acquire knowledge despite having some commuting difficulties. For example, students who live far away from schools can study from home by enrolling in online courses and still obtain certificates as do other classmates. Moreover, online video lessons can guarantee that students will not miss out on any important lectures because of unexpected situations.
On the other hand, working with other students in groups or teams can bring out some outstanding advantages. Firstly, it is beneficial for every individual to join and study collectively with groups as they can collaborate and hence, unlock their crucial soft skills. Students will have riveting opportunities to cooperate on projects to enhance their solidarity and efficiency. In addition, studying in teams can help deal with personal difficulties. For instance, classmates can raise issues and questions relating to the lectures, which accordingly can be solved immediately by group members. Moreover, by studying together, students can absorb and remember lessons more effectively, therefore improving their academic performance.
In conclusion, in my point of view, even though there are some considerable advantages offered by online lectures, I strongly agree with the given statement that studying in groups is much more beneficial than learning online.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of diverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 92
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 78
- nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65298507463 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06578163633 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3275492001 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.214285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225986828299 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782348677656 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522516067126 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144500981863 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377820907984 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.