The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group, 1998-2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given.
The supplied bar chart shows the percentage of using Internet of Taiwanese following the difference in age periods from 1998 to 2000. In general, the ratio Internet usage, which was used by the 16-30 years and 31-50 years group was higher than 2 compared groups.
As can be seen in the graph, the percentage of using Internet of the age less than 15 and over 50 increased anually that went up dramatically in 1999 and then rose slightly in 2000. However, the people who used Internet in group 16-30 years and 31-50 years held high percentage in 1998, but fail down in the next 2 years.
Especially, in 1998, the numberous Taiwanese who was 16-30 years and spent a lot of time for Internet reach up to 53 percent, this is also the highest numer among other groups between 1998 and 2000. Whereas, in that year, group less than 15 just get 2 percent the number of people using Internet and lowest in 3 years. After 2 years, group age less than 15 and over 50 were improved about the ratio of Internet usage but they were still very difference to 2 groups left.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 72
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47422680412 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26114227207 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530927835052 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.0471998626 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149382851575 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082383199043 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319231060274 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113832961535 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167370269029 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.