People should seek out information from a variety of news sources to be well-informed
Some people think it is better to browse one news source to seek out information they need. However, in my opinion, people should ingest information from different sources as many as possible, which is advantageous for them to have in-depth understanding and get away from bias caused by a single source.
To begin with, each news site stands up for a specific political stance or economical view, and particular preference of the public. Additionally, these days, algorithms working on an online news site put bias into people’s mind by providing certain types of news they would like. Let's sayLet say, when you check news only from a site that represents conservative views in politics and economics, then your mind would naturally tilt a conservative side. Nowadays this phenomenon is much worse than before because of algorithms. Thus, we should check information from various sources so as not to be trapped in bias.
Moreover, studying a variety of news sources to get information is truly helpful because you can have in-depth knowledge and profound understanding. I assure you with my personal example. One day, I read an article about tv show <Pachinko>. After reading it, I realized that I could virtually access superficial information about the show and the background of it by looking over a single piece of news. So, I tried to search more articles from different sources, which developed my understanding much more.
To sum up, I admit that this process is sometimes overwhelming and time consuming. However, if you really want to be ‘well-informed’, then your choice is to be provided information from many other news sources. Furthermore, I would like to add the fact that it is even more beneficial to crystallize and organize thoughts and knowledge if you seek out other types of sources too such as books and films. That is, the more sources, the better informed. News sources? Definitely!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-23 | prakriti malla | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | rahmi88 | 63 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | rahmi88 | 63 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | prakriti malla | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television does not give people an accurate view of human nature Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- People should seek out information from a variety of news sources to be well informed 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, then, thus, well, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09810126582 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99159447084 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.610235298 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6875 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439019036862 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127055153703 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129141293115 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266653481195 0.150856017488 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913218556086 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.