To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Prompt suggests that in order to understand the most significant characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. I agree to the point that studying major cities will be more effective and be a short-cut in trying to find out a society’s characteristics.
In modern societies, vast amount of people live in cities rather than rural areas, which causes majority of culture following people to be created in the area as well. In my own nation, South Korea, almost over 50 percent of our population resides inside Seoul, the capital city and its nearby satellite cities, also known as Seoul metropolitan area. The gathering of people eventually leads to concentration of resources. For instance, university for education, companies or government institutions as for working places, and sophisticated, intertwined network of subways for transportation are all highly condensed in the giant city. Accordingly, we can increase chances of witnessing many kinds of aspects of our society and as importantly, in a relatively short time as well.
Yet, there are characteristics of society that we can’t encounter in a modern, mega-sized cities. There are things you can only experience in rural areas only. Perhaps, nature can be easily accessed compared to a city and this can leave some nature-related things to be present only in the countryside. Not only personal skills like how to farm, how to raise animals but also cooperation culture between other residents in the countryside can be seen only in these places.
Nevertheless, to better understand characteristics of a society, inspecting how people live in major cities are easier. Each major cities have their own culture or styles of their living. For example, the representative of eastern part of U.SA, perhaps, New York city is known to be quite different between Los Angeles which represents the western part of the states. Because of their weather being so different and geographical gaps existing, the city landscape (including houses and buildings) are conspicuously different. By comparing between major cities as such, one can relatively, easily figure out the differences and characteristics of society.
For these reasons, studying major cities can be helpful in studying characteristics of our society. Notwithstanding the other methods which we can find out about our society, looking into major cities is an effective and faster way to understand society.
- If someone wants to travel to different countries do you think that it is better to travel abroad when he or she is young and has lots of energy or do you think that it is better to travel abroad when he or she is older and more experienced 83
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- These days young people are less reliant on their parents advice to make important life decisions 90
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura Socks Inc A recent study of Dura Socks customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our soc 72
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City s local newspaper In our region of Trillura the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend the city run public schools comes from taxes that each city government collect 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, as for, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34545454545 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17854164718 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553246753247 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0165955573 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207631462484 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698308628963 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535384688589 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126392177741 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537821262671 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.