An outline of the structure of a home smokery and the way it works are portrayed clearly in the given diagram.
Overall, it is clear that of the three steps, two steps happen under the ground, while the remaining happens above the ground level.
As shown in the diagram, the first part of the structure is an empty underground section with a lid which can be opened at a space above the ground level. This lid, when opened, allows air inside the structure to assist the smoking process.
In the second part, a similar structure is there with a lid at the ground level. This lid can be opened and wooden logs can be placed inside the chamber. Smoking food can be initiated when these logs are burned.
In the third part, a bended long funnel is directed upwards in a fixed structure, which has a wide opening at the bottom which connects the fireplace and a narrow opening at the top. When logs burn, smoke passes through this opening to the chamber above the ground level, inside which fish and meat are hung from the top for cooking.
- the accompanying pie illustrations show the use of web based social networking y people in Australia in 2011 and 2014 73
- there is no compelling reason to go to different places to learn about other peoples different societies we can learn so much from books films and the internet can be used as a source of data on various societies do you agree or disagree to this idea 67
- some people argue that regular games have more benefits for young people than modern ones to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the map below illustrate a beachfront area in Australia between 1950 and today 78
- in today s world private companies rather than the government ay for and conduct most scientific research do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53968253968 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16864101116 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6451066102 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896919357825 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052565480519 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914529536429 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819349755916 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112834575917 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.