Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The aim of the research is to find the better results than the existing ones, for the greater good of the mankind. The prompt suggests that the experts should invest their experties and intelligence on the things that may benefit larger population. In my opinion, I agree with the given statement for the following reasons.
Firstly, the resources that are required for the research are not always copious and the expert and their experties faid away with the time. So, to utilise the resource and the get meaning to the life one must research in the areas that help mankind. For an instance, if there is very low budget allocation for the research and experiment then to make it count or to get the better response from the people. The money and mind must be invested in finding solution to the problems that mankind feels is impeneterable. Like, simply, why waste mone and technology in rockets and exterristial bodies rather investing them in finding cure for; disease, poverty, hunger.
Secondly, the outcome of the result that helps to solve the prevalent problems are well acclaimed by the public. For example, while Gallelio or Einstin or Newton were so keened on finding things that were iconoclastic; however, irrelevent to moast as their findings bounced of the laymens head. Moreover, Alexander Fleming, who discovered penicillin, cure to bacteria infected region, was awarded Nobel Prize. On the otherhand, although not much value was given to the precedent at their time of findings, their work earned honour and acclaims later.
Lastly, some might argue that, investing on the areas that are less like to benefit majority of the population, today, may benefit in future. For an instance, Madam Curie research on the Radium, which caused her death, reactiveness to other elemants was later found to react with the cancerous cells and helped in their diagnosis and cure. So, the finding of today may bring greater good to the future. As, a result investing the experties on the field that expert fells can do good is relevent.
In conclusion, the outcomes of the findings are always gives mankind a essential information that could be of importance in future. But, the one that solves the probles by their experties today is critically acclaimed and is able to taste the fruit of their labor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | wikoxa7293@ekcsoft.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions becau 53
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 70
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 58
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 59
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d. For an instance, if there is very low budget allocation for the research and e...
^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...y of the population, today, may benefit in future. For an instance, Madam Curie research ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y may bring greater good to the future. As, a result investing the experties on th...
^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f the findings are always gives mankind a essential information that could be of ...
^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...information that could be of importance in future. But, the one that solves the probles b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98708010336 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55677671004 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6885791964 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1472305754 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443692451258 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415303964308 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828685549437 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419022795941 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.