Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The advancement in any field be it; science, arts, business, law and order that we relish today has all been precursored by the past events. Past events are guide to the present and it has been like that since the beginning of time. The prompt suggests that knowledge of past incident cannot help people at future to make important decision: reason being, as we are unable to make connections between current and past events until we have some distance from both. I strongly disagree, with the given statement for the following reasons.
Events at past has always been a precursor for future. We have learned from our mistakes and improvised, since beginning of our existence. We can all imagine what would have happen if we had been following same procedure to achieve same failure cessation again and again. But we thrive to change, to bring revolution only after we have learned from our past. What would have happened, if scientist in past did not improvise the ideas that were put forth by scientist before them. We would still be swindling around with no success at hand. For an instance, let’s say, a scientist at present is given to research at a random topic, which is still of his field but out of his forte, then he first thing he would do is go through the similar research that has been conducted in the past. Then, he would acquire knowledge of what is it or how it happens how to proceed and so on? This is not just relevant to the science field it applicable in other multi-disciplinaries. In the field of music when there were just repetition similar composition: musicians like Mozart and Beethoven to Hans Zimmer has created the new symphony. Mathematician have come up with new equations or have solved the unsolved equations of the pasts. Entrepreneur today are more competitive than in past.
Furthermore, our society is dynamic: we are never at par. We keep on thriving to make change followed by numerous mistakes and amendments. In stone age, people use to eat whatever they like and whenever they like; when the population started to grow and food supply ebbed then the first domestic agriculture was started to reduce famine. This is us, human, we do mistakes we learn from then improvise the technique and sustain the procedure, until further amendments are needed. Similarly, in our Judicial system we learn from our past. No, constitution is perfect: it has many loop holes to which the criminal play with. In Nepal, before mid-1970's the was law to prevent child marriage- to protect women rights. But, later in 2011 child marriage or any kind of physical relation with the girl below age of 16 was named illegal and accused had to face 10 years in prison. See, we did something wrong in past, we had urge to wright the wrong and we corrected the wrong learning from our past.
In conclusion, some might argue, that past information cannot be applicable at present but learning from the past has always help human kind to evolve and come at a better conclusion as aforementioned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | Zahid6400 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Jeyodi123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | vrushali28 | 50 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | Saugat Basnet | 59 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t 60
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of our 65
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions becau 53
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 70
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...nce. We can all imagine what would have happen if we had been following same procedure...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1267, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...preneur today are more competitive than in past. Furthermore, our society is dynamic: ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...es and amendments. In stone age, people use to eat whatever they like and whenever ...
^^^
Line 3, column 900, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... in prison. See, we did something wrong in past, we had urge to wright the wrong and we...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...t but learning from the past has always help human kind to evolve and come at a bett...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, similarly, so, still, then, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 98.0 58.6224719101 167% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2494.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76864244742 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63640553012 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520076481836 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9776005483 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9230769231 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1153846154 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03846153846 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339726009314 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909604279679 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111912700199 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233368119675 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125487305137 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.