Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Humanity has been regarding heroic figures for ages, such characteristic was found in history each with a story to tell. With every century passing there is more and more of stories of people who have had done a heroic acts, these stories will reach tremendous audience due to the growing media business. Until todays society where the media is within reach to everybody and these heroic characters will be known in no time. The prompt suggest that in our modern society it’s no longer possible to consider any man or woman as a hero due to how media scrutiny which can subject people’s reputation and erase it. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this statement and argue that society stopped contemplating heroic figure for two reasons.
To begin, the process of prodcasting news in varies forms e.g. television, radio, newspaper, has a downside of not being able to show the whole picture of what occurred at a particular moment. for instance, if a person was shown in cameras that he is harassing a small child but in reality he is getting red of insect from her shoulder then he will be seen as a disgrace to humanity even though he is trying to help. This example indicates that clearly what get projected to society through media is not the complete truth, it reach the audience through the angle of which the act has been viewed. Therefore, what seen as a heroic figure one day will be an evil person on another day depending upon the media projection of their actions from the wanted prospective.
Furthermore, keeping a clean reputation while being exposed to media is an intense rule in view of the fact that people who are under the public eyes will experience wide sorts of judgments. To illustrate, widely known people such as singers, politicians, athletes and so on, has indeed up and downs along their careers and each time they switch rules between “the bad guy” or “the good guy”. This example can be noticed in Will Smith’s situation where he was idolized and loved by many, but can’t say the same about him anymore after the Oscar’s misfortune. Perhaps this can be observed when a certain heroic, public figure makes mistakes under the eyes of the press, these unfortunate events damage the image of the wrongdoer on the long run which makes it difficult to restore the damaged, old heroic aura.
Of course, some will argue that if someone is cautious enough they will be able to maintain their image and their heroic stand. But isn’t this high demanding of the nature of humanity? People tend to make mistakes, whether it’s neglectable or massive, what’s important is that they learn from it. In either ways public figures can inspire or extinguish other’s hope they indeed have an effect on soceity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Humanity has been regarding heroic figur...
^^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'act'?
Suggestion: act
...es of people who have had done a heroic acts, these stories will reach tremendous au...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng heroic figure for two reasons. To begin, the process of prodcasting new...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...f what occurred at a particular moment. for instance, if a person was shown in came...
^^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...getting red of insect from her shoulder then he will be seen as a disgrace to humani...
^^^^
Line 4, column 538, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaches'?
Suggestion: reaches
...ugh media is not the complete truth, it reach the audience through the angle of which...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions from the wanted prospective. Furthermore, keeping a clean reputation ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...store the damaged, old heroic aura. Of course, some will argue that if someo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y indeed have an effect on soceity.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8417721519 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47227230632 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567510548523 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8208160724 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8823529412 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217616029808 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660883339035 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810815220463 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12257766333 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923487212751 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.