There is a persuasive idea that making a profit from cultural traditions brings them to the verge of being damaged. Nevertheless, some individuals support the idea that they can merely be preserved by tourism and I think both opinions have their own arguments.
It is evident that travelers take the lead in the general economy of a country, so it is more imperative than ever before that the government should boost its tourism. Nonetheless, this gives rise to the risk of losing traditions. In particular, foreigners might create novel norms of the countries’ culture, and in the long run, it might be miscomprehended by the public around the world. To be specific, international visitors can not understand all the meaning of a traditions and that leads to its new form. However, personally, I believe that this is not likely to occur due to the qualified tour guides and the tourists’ knowledge.
The issue of cultural traditions can be solved by tourism. The more widely spread a tradition is, the more it is saved from disappearing. It not only saves the culture, but also spreads it among individuals. However, there are still some solutions that can be tackled with this matter besides aiming at tourists. In the first instance, the government can introduce policies for tradition preservation to enhance the effectiveness of tourism. On top of that is the citizen’s awareness that should be raised by education and propagandization.
In conclusion, visitors might cause cultural traditions to be destroyed, but to some extent, it is one of the solutions to save them from being vanished.
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age in the UK who used the Internet every day from 2003 2006 78
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe it is the only way to save the traditions Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns to save them from being vanished.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, i think, in conclusion, in particular, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12878787879 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09020342509 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0620441329 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264091311547 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860548326505 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562049383064 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16706839741 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549185428832 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.