Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions Discuss both view and

Essay topics:

Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

Some people maintain that people who are creative and able to work individually are more suitable for companies’ recruitment. However, there is a growing concern that companies should prioritize people who are appropriate in teamwork and follow instructions. In this essay, the arguments surrounding this issue will be examined.
On the one hand, people who have creativity and can work on their own might proceed to work more quickly and produce more impressive work results. An innovative person is capable to think audaciously which can bring a breakthrough to the production of a company and ascribe to its development by marking its image outstandingly in the market. Moreover, people who work themselves means that they have a certain standpoint that can not be affected by other opinions. As a result, their working speed is proved to be faster. This is a great advantage when that company, for instance, has a sudden issue that requires staff to solve instantaneously.
On the other hand, people who have more experience in doing teamwork and following directions can benefit their company through their studiousness and efficient productivity. A marketing method, for instance, when being examined under different visions might be selected thoroughly and effectively; therefore, it is understandable that people who have a teamwork tendency will be able to do their work excellently. In addition, a person who always listens and follow the guidelines may less trigger some serious mistakes in working process such as print the wrong report or read the incorrect statistics plus can ensure the progress schedule.
All things considered, convincing as two viewpoints may appear at first, I am assured to say that recruiting people who have the ability to work in a team and follow directions is more logic-based for companies according to the above assumptions.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-27 Fila 73 view
2022-09-22 jany01 67 view
2022-06-08 gwyneth+12 78 view
2020-09-10 stsoutsold 73 view
2020-07-03 moctutuyen 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e outstandingly in the market. Moreover, people who work themselves means that th...
^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less trig'?
Suggestion: less trig
...s listens and follow the guidelines may less trigger some serious mistakes in working proces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32996632997 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0611597696 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9445924723 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.916666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376053512277 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142073658992 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980058114568 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243392771179 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054439790589 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.