Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence for films of television and cinema. Others feel that violent films should be not released. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Currently, the occurrence of violent scenes in movies is quite common, especially in blockbuster action films. Some adopt the view that the council is believed to be responsible for censoring films so as to stay away from excessively aggressive scenes. Meanwhile, others think that this type of screen art is not allowed. This essay will discuss both views of the essay before my view is drawn at the end.
Those who disapprove would harbor the thought that humans, these days, are significantly influenced by this kind of art. For example, a part of youth are obsessed with behaviour and dialogue which are performed by actors and actresses. Because of this negative effect, the violent films being condemned and facing a wave of public protests is understandable. Otherwise, those scenes are thought to attract the audience's attention because they contribute to enhancing theatricality. Consequently, if vicious actions are cut back on, it makes the movies less thrilling and leads to the result the viewers may decrease, diminishing the revenues of the cinemas.
Despite the fact that negative outcomes are inevitable, action movies superior to regulations also bring some benefits. Movies with an acceptable level of violence reflect the hidden corners of society such as school violence, cyberviolence. The violent scenes help viewers clearly visualize these issues. Thereby also helping people to have a more correct understanding of today's social status. Thus, if the level of violence is moderated and people have a proper view of them, it may become an educational tool.
This essay discussed that aggressive should be broadcast ban. Nonetheless, it is believed that the censorship boards will consider the level of violence to situate with social standards and avoid negative reactions from the community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...d to be responsible for censoring films so as to stay away from excessively aggressive s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
...those scenes are thought to attract the audiences attention because they contribute to en...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, while, as to, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38111888112 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86411447805 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7332375996 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207964484106 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577980793423 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493510638335 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11653648164 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408097201172 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.