It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

In this day and age, due to the aid of transportation, people have ability to set foot on everywhere even the isolated area. Many believe that the advantages of this will outweigh the drawbacks. From my perspective, I totally agree with this statement because of these following justifications.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the possibility to commute anywhere in the world can exert some adverse impacts on people. To begin with, travellers can be under threat of facing up with dangers along the journey. Moving to remote area seems to be the long voyage, so it will contain a lot of unexpected situations such as the insufficient food and drink, the depletion of fuel, the wild beast and so on. In addition, commuting to far-flung area may affect the natural environment adversely. Due to the fact that the appearance of foreign visitors in these places can cause water contamination, land erosion and also resource depletion.
Nevertheless, I believe that the disadvantages of this trend will be outweighed by the benefits. First and foremost, the ability to travel anywhere worldwide will enable people to gain hands on experience. Through the long journey, travellers may learn how to have good preparation before setting off and train some soft skills like self-care skill, self-motivation skill and so on. Secondly, travel broadens the mind because people can absorb new knowledge throughout the voyage. If people have opportunity to commute to other places, they will have golden chance to discover new things which means that beside getting the ready information pulished in books and social media, there will be real newfound knowledge can be learnt.
In conclusion, the development of transportation which opens new abilities to travel, can cause adverse impacts. However, the drawbacks of reaching global places can be probably eclipsed by the potential aspects.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use of these following justifications. On the one hand, it is undeniable that t...
^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ably eclipsed by the potential aspects.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22039473684 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94217815734 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1112663987 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129811113564 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484556282389 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452868751319 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761969499059 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208400522955 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.