Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion

The sport events and happening are generally inclined towards heaving play in any rustic to enhance or disgrace the bucolic's legacy. In this frame of reference nation usually adhere to the segregated views regarding the event of sport conducted in any homey. A sizeable faction contends that heaving play events in the provincial are rational and imperative for the homey; meanwhile, others believe that it has a catastrophic impact on the bucolic. This essay will elaborate on both these views, and after analysing the core aspect of each side my opinion delineates that it's preferable to promote international events regarding physical games.

The first perspective that narrates the significance of avoiding games happening in one's rustic is generally backed by the traditionalist; they bluntly advocate the hosting expenditure and administrative cost. According to their notion, it's imperative to emphasise the pragmatism of avoiding the cost and that money can be utilised in any fair spot as well as the department. As a matter of fact, Qatar's local government is striving hard to conduct football WorldCup 2022 they spend a huge amount of money on it, which can be used in another sphere of the agrarian's national interest and serve to own crowd.

The concept of conducting play events is comparably a modernistic stance which has a lot of fruitition including revenue generation and cultural enhancement. To include this fact that, more and more population come to one's rustic the more financial gaining achieve. When international folk come to any homey they must give that provincial's spot to make a country better economy. Resultingly, the homey elevates local fields and departments. Secondly, cultural promotion is another core aspect of the practice. As a matter of fact, the rustic's culture gets recognition from international tourists and grows up worldwide.

To conclude, although both stances have their own viability and merits , I believe that opting for international play events is crucial and has a lot of positive impact on the concerned rustic. And therefore, just blindly exercising on an event's cost also can be overlooked by revenue generation.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bucolics'' or 'bucolic's'?
Suggestion: bucolics'; bucolic's
...n any rustic to enhance or disgrace the bucolics legacy. In this frame of reference nati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ificance of avoiding games happening in ones rustic is generally backed by the tradi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... that, more and more population come to ones rustic the more financial gaining achie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tic the more financial gaining achieve. When international folk come to any homey th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nces have their own viability and merits , I believe that opting for international...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as a matter of fact, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32173913043 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96046318618 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576811594203 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3198657479 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112164587245 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364074413719 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322598133323 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705217975505 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461039652536 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.