The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities
between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The bar chart compares costs of an average house in five major cities during 13 years starting from 1989.
From an overall view, most of the mentioned regions reported a decrease in the prices in the period between 1990 and 1995. However, from 1996 to 2002, there was a significant increase in the prices as London experienced the fastest inflation in house prices over the 13-year period.
In the first five years after 1989, the average costs in London and Tokyo evidently fell by 7%, while in New York a 5% drop was noticed. In contrast, prices in both Madrid and Frankfurt increased by approximately 2%.
Over the following years, between 1996 and 2002, all five cities registered a major growth in the prices. As for London, which marked the greaest trend among the rest of the cities, an average house costs 12% more than its price in 1989. Furthermore, citizens in New York and Madrid had to pay obviously more, with prices rising by 5% in each. Homes in Tokyo, on the other hand, remained cheaper than they were in year 1989, whereas prices in Frankfurt remained stable.
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 78
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart compares costs of an avera...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... during 13 years starting from 1989. From an overall view, most of the mentio...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use prices over the 13-year period. In the first five years after 1989, the ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kfurt increased by approximately 2%. Over the following years, between 1996 a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, whereas, while, as for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75661375661 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3459985726 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7670041378 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.8888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356910591058 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137699964544 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644692026303 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218238885396 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549586904605 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.