Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices
It is a common belief that the alternative of choices make life easier. However, I firmly believe having a lot of choices would probably a problem.
To begin with, having available options can complicate your life without necessary. To illustrate, students in Viet Nam are always struggle to decide their university as more hundred of choices. This leads to wasting time because the students cannot make a decision until the deadline. Consequently, students could be panic, depressed or even regret because of their wrong decisions. Moreover, people would be completely confuse when shopping. There are too many products, goods essentially exactly the same in the stores. The purpose of the shops is to retain their buyers as long as they can to increase the sales, but complex range of choice when doing shopping is potentially harmful financially. Customers could buy a lot of stuff to gratify great satisfaction at that time and then realize that they had bought useless things. All in all, having too many choices can be detrimental to a person’s life and lead to some drawbacks.
On the other hand, the increasing number of options means having more opportunities for people in all classes. The wide range of choice helps people have unlimited experience. For example, people have multiple choices of clothes and it helps them to try any style depending on their preference. It also encourages a great creativity of the stylist. Therefore, the freedom of choice can acquire people’s ability to make new things.
To conclude, the increase of options can encourage the considerable diversity of the society. Alternatively, too many choices can also raise issues relating to its disadvantages.
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and the planned future development of the site 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of boys and girls in one country who played various sports in 2010 67
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows how respondents expressed their interests in six selected sports in three seperate years 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'struggled'.
Suggestion: struggled
...strate, students in Viet Nam are always struggle to decide their university as more hund...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ggle to decide their university as more hundred of choices. This leads to wasting time ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22181818182 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85591397421 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592727272727 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6139157201 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7777777778 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304948250897 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888363492627 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847544735529 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179096224859 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393586421071 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.