Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In modern times, parents learn more from their children than children learn from their parents.
Nowadays, education has become the top concern of modern citizens. Recently, there is a heated debate on the relationship between parents and children, some claim that in modern times, parents learn more from their kids. As for me, I believe that parents still have lots of experiences that can impart to kids, especially considering their advice in daily life and career.
Firstly, for daily life, parents usually have tons of valuable advice ready for their children, for they have accumulated experience from the past. To begin with, they are good at household chores, which will help kids to live independently in the future. This is because as an infant who is just born into this world, he or she knows nothing but relies on the two grown-ups' guidance to survive and grow, ranging from using chopsticks to obtain food, doing housework, and keeping a clean living environment as well as cooking some food to feed themselves. In addition, apart from life skills, children will also acquire a variety of life lessons from their parents. For instance, after graduating from college, I would love to get together with my friends more often, however, none of them have time to hang out with me, causing me to be very frustrated, and even wondering if I have done anything wrong making them annoyed. Then, my mom patiently talked with me for over two hours and gave me her suggestions that I should move on, because young people nowadays were only focused on their own work, and paid little attention to others. After the talk, I felt so much relieved. Thus, I am convinced that parents' advice is still useful.
Furthermore, for their career, parents could also serve as mentors to guide the younger generation. As age increases, kids will finally become adults, and also seek an occupation to contribute to society. However, this will not alter the fact that they are still kids in their parents' eyes and continue consulting the two old pals about how to cope with difficulties or how to prioritize projects they have at work. For example, my first job was as a data analyst at the university, back then I had to process numerous spreadsheets without cooperating with others. At this time, my dad gave me some useful tips like asking colleagues to do some group projects. Since working together can help you learn how to deal with different sorts of audiences and the ability to resolve conflicts and overcome barriers become much stronger. All such people skills are so precious in the long run.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed, I still maintain that children can still learn a lot from their parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-17 | baishuhang2020 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | baishuhang2020 | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | baishuhang2020 | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | baishuhang2020 | 90 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | shuya | 90 | view |
- TPO55 80
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 80
- You should always state your honest opinion even when you know that most other people disagree with your point of view 84
- TPO 60 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, apart from, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87695749441 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53580577863 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595078299776 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7746796541 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.736842105 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0526315789 5.45110844103 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329285744893 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958165747127 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102949849759 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235400802463 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690779107715 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.