The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the table delineating the percentages of people who watched different television programs in a European country in 2012.
It is conspicuous that the data is split into three different age categories 11-15, 15-20 and 21-25. Furthermore, feature films and sports programs were quite popular amongst all age groups and attracted similar consumption of viewer. In the interim, news programs and cartoons showed the biggest disparity in the percentages of audience from the distinct age groups.
Standing at feature films and sports programs attracted approximately 20% of viewer from each group. In addition, TV dramas also saw similar percentages from each group, at roughly 10%. Additionally, wwhile soap operas attracted 11-15-year-olds and 21-25-year-olds, accounting for 17% and 19%, respectively, omly 12% of 15-20-year-olds viewed them.
When it comes to the biggest distincts between viewing percentages of all the age groups were in cartoons and news program. Thus, 29% of 11-15-year-olds watched cartoons, compared with only 4% off 21-25-year-olds. In contrast, 23% of 21-25-year-olds watches news programs, compared to only 6% of 11-15-year-olds.
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73988439306 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4406321824 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630057803468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3623628942 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118268209364 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591981442352 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557505801879 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993594959491 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691103052475 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.