One Child Policy
In the late 1970s, China implemented a strict one-child policy in which each couple could only have one child. This policy has effectively controlled the population, but does that mean that the policy is completely fair? No. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement that families should only have one child per couple, like the time period in the 1970s.
First things first, the policy causes the problem of population aging, which refers to the process of relative decrease in the population of the younger people. As the policy decreases the young, the ratio of the population will change while increasing the burden on the families and government. The families at that time are facing the burden of caring for at most four old people, and simultaneously, help balance the family’s economical aspects. For instance, not long ago, my grandma got cancer. She needs numerous chemotherapies y surgeries to recover her weak state. My mom needs to take care of her, and take her to the hospital every week. However, if she gives birth to more than just one kid, they can each help in taking care of grandma, which decreases my parents’ burden.
Second, the implementation of the policy may cause gender imbalance between men and woman. Currently, the sex ratio of newborn babies is seriously unbalanced. Therefore, if the high sex ratio continues, the impact on the population structure would be unimaginable. Simultaneously, the imbalance between men and woman will bring series of social problems,. In addition, different jobs are suitable for different genders. The imbalance of gender might cause people having difficulties with finding a job, which does not help in our society’s economy. China is bound to have a serious population contradiction at some time in the future. The gender imbalance means the reduction of relative national strength.
Last but not least, being the one and only kid in one family, kids feel extreme loneliness in their childhood. When parents are preoccupied with their own work, kids can only play and work alone, especially when they are in big cities. On the other hand, if kids have siblings as their companions, they can grow up together in a very long time. There is no doubt that it is an advantage to the time when they step into the complicated society.
In a nutshell, I strongly disagree with the statement presented in the question, and I believe that China now should not follow the policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-18 | ayumiyazaki | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | ayumiyazaki | 70 | view |
- This week we are discussing professional development or workplace training Some employees prefer to develop skills that will help them do their current job better Others prefer to focus on training that helps them prepare for a better position in the futu 70
- Which of the following measures would make a city safer Hiring more police officers and getting them properly trained to serve the public Increasing the number of rehab facilities to help people quit using illegal drugs Improving educational facilities to 66
- Which of the following measures would make a city safer Hiring more police officers and getting them properly trained to serve the public Increasing the number of rehab facilities to help people quit using illegal drugs Improving educational facilties to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should give primary school students aged5 10 no more than 30 minutes homework because they ve already got enough instructions from school in the days 60
- Pterosaurs 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...man will bring series of social problems,. In addition, different jobs are suitab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00488997555 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75198118561 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552567237164 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1242543382 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7826086957 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60869565217 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246669960085 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607200771085 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116569129894 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135857527993 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184395987402 0.0645574589148 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.