Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Following China’s policy that originated in the 1970’s, families worldwide should only have one child per couple to prevent overpopulation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Do not use memorized examples.
During the recurrence of the covid-19, people are now discovering the importance of treasure food. And in the past, due to the lack of resources and overcrowded population, the Chinese government provide a policy for the solution situation, which is to families worldwide should only have one child per couple . I think his policy isn’t a good solution to solve it, due to the following reasons.
First of all, it is dehumanized . When a mother is pregnant with two or more children and born without the government knowing. If the government knows, they need to pay a large amount of fine, and only leave one child for her and bring away the others. This is dehumanized.
Secondly, it may cause the social security system to collapse. In the past, lots of families have lots of children, and some part of the annuity is provided forby their children. So every child only needs to provide a little money, so that their parent can get enough annuity to live. However, if we observe the policy, every family can only have one child, and this will cause every child to need to provide a double annuity than not to observe . So this may cause the social security system to become chaotic.
After the Chinese government provides this policy, they just recall this policy and start to provide the three children policy. To be the only child in the family may cause the decline of this family because he is the only child in the family so he must be successful. However, if they have more than one child, they only need one of the children to be successful. So the consequence of the one-child policy is very dangerous.
As a result, I think the one-child policy is not suitable to solve the overcrowded problem, due to the collapse of the social security system and dehumanization. However, if we agree with the policy, there will be very dangerous consequences already in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-18 | ayumiyazaki | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w discovering the importance of treasure food. And in the past, due to the lack o...
^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...de should only have one child per couple . I think his policy isn’t a good solutio...
^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sons. First of all, it is dehumanized . When a mother is pregnant with two or m...
^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ide a double annuity than not to observe . So this may cause the social security s...
^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cause he is the only child in the family so he must be successful. However, if th...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he one-child policy is very dangerous. As a result, I think the one-child polic...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, i think, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74164133739 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5859095956 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449848024316 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3951093634 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189319923474 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591806961777 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564045351303 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111888667728 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046523995856 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.