In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of diverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
Stepping into the 21st century, there can be seen a possible transformation from utilizing cars with drivers into more automatic vehicles, meaning sole-passenger automobiles. The question is whether this trend will bring more harm than good.
For one, a great number of individuals debate that driver-free vehicles may carry with it numerous downsides for various reasons. Indeed, since vehicles would no longer be manipulated by humans, this may contribute to the striking reduction in the figure for laborers as well as the workforce, especially shippers. As a result, unemployment and out-of-work situations would be inclined to emerge, which would ultimately contribute to a myriad of tremendously detrimental influences in the domestic economy as well as will-be colossal burdens on authorities’ shoulders. These aforementioned rationales, hence, would make it obvious that automatic means of transport could exert a pool of downturns to some extent.
I, nevertheless, still contend that those above-presented cons would not suffice to eclipse the potential upside. First and foremost, the rise of automatic means of transport potentially perpetuates the devaluation of the domestic budget, which the administrations have to annually designate to establish career opportunities for drivers and also the commuting industry. This means governments may reverse these invested budgets to the other pivotal aspects. The following reasons would be the augmentation of safety and convenience upon commuting by driver-free vehicles, which is dramatically prioritized by the majority of global inhabitants.
To recapitulate, while it is obvious that vehicles maneuvered by humans would be advantageous to some extent, I still hold my belief that the merits of non-driver vehicles may overshadow the downturns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... upside. First and foremost, the rise of automatic means of transport potentially...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86090225564 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32838426012 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624060150376 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6014310106 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.727272727 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160569281765 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572695262549 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445596767827 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103477809139 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445361587432 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.