The supplied chart gives information about the British industrial personnel distribution in various fields in the years of 1841 and 2011.
Overall, it is clear that all industries experienced a considerable change in employment throughout the period, especially those in services, manufacturing and agriculture/fishing. Manufacturing were surpassed its position as the dominant industry in 1841 by services. With the exception of these two industries, agriculture/fishing, construction and energy/water had a lower share.
In 1841, the number of employees working in services accounted for a third, however that percentage had substantially increased to 81%, which is the highest amount of employees in 2011. Manufacturing and agriculture/fishing, on the other hand, suffered a major fall during the period. Manufacturing accounted for 36% of workers in 1841 and reduced to a quarter in the year of 2011. Besides agriculture/fishing dropped to 1% from 22% of staffs at the beginning.
In both years, the remaining industrial lines had a steady trend in addition to the aforementioned fluctuations, accounting for little under 10% of all UK employments. While construction reported a minor growth of 3%, for 5% to 8%, the workforce in energy/water declined by 2%.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportion of expenditure by students on average at one university in 2000 and 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table gives information about the number of deep mines producing coal in the UK between 1913 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavent 11
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: Except; Except for
... dominant industry in 1841 by services. With the exception of these two industries, agriculture/fishi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65968586387 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.89654036051 2.65546596893 147% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633507853403 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.624460129 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212398090948 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741796060493 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563031999857 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122490798177 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473074241993 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.