The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
The prompt states that a greatness of a country is determined by the welfare of its people in general, and not based on select leaders, artists or scientists. I mostly agree with it and in fact a country can be termed as great if a vast majority of people residing in it are happy. This happiness can be measured based on a combination of several parameters and metrics such as GDP per capita, purchasing power of people, access to education and healthcare etc. However, in very few cases, achievements and laurels of a select few may help to accelerate the growth of the country.
To begin, The lives of vast majority of people living in a country should dictate whether a country is doing good or not. The most important metric that we can use to check the welfare of people in our country is GDP(Gross Domestic Process) per capita and the purchasing power that it gives. The first metric may help us know on an average how much each person is able to earn, and the second metric will provide us information about how much and what all things is a person able to buy with his/her earnings. In order to live a happy life, people in that country should be able to afford basic necessities like food, clothes and access to shelter, and the above two metrics gives us a pretty good idea about that. The welfare of the people in our country should not be based on emotions and perceptions of few people, but it should actually be translated in reality for a vast majority of people. A select few people having a feeling that our country is great is not sufficient, and it should be based on concrete data.
Moreover, In order to ensure welfare of the citizens, another important factor is for them to be able to live a life without any stress. This is only possible if people are able to afford for their kids education, if they are able to afford to go to hospitals for health checkups and if they are able to find jobs to sustain themselves. In order for us to assess about these things, first we should have an unbiased data across all over the country regarding healthcare infrastructures, schools, and the employment rate in our country. Thus a country that is able to provide all of these facilities to their citizens may be termed as a great nation, as citizens having access can lead a life without any worries and stress. Thus another indicator to determine whether a nation is great or not is its accessibility to health care, education infrastructure and job opportunities.
However, in few cases, a certain person or a select organisation's achievements can help to really accelerate the growth of a nation, and put them in a path towards greatness. For instance, say if a country's science and research unit is able to produce hybrid seeds which increase the yield of crops, then this may be extremely important for removing hunger in the country. Thus, just with a contribution of few select scientists and organisations, a country can remove hunger among all its populations.
In conclusion, I feel that the indicator for the country's greatness should be based on the lives of common people living in it, based on several aspects mentioned above, and not on a select few people's accomplishments. However, in few cases the achievements of these select few people might help the country to reach this greatness quickly, but in itself is not a great indicator in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-01 | student193044 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not cooperation 58
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions becau 53
- Two years ago the city council voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza In the past two years however there has 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 528, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little may'.
Suggestion: little may
...s, achievements and laurels of a select few may help to accelerate the growth of the co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mportant metric that we can use to check the welfare of people in our country is ...
^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...n that country should be able to afford basic necessities like food, clothes and access to shelte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...and the employment rate in our country. Thus a country that is able to provide all o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 725, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... a life without any worries and stress. Thus another indicator to determine whether ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...certain person or a select organisations achievements can help to really accelera...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, then, thus, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2794.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 597.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68006700168 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73320438142 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407035175879 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 879.3 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.7503816772 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.7 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.85 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192632171044 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746216171875 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806084004775 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133595392609 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638835295638 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.