Nowadays, whether Science and Technology or History is of greater significance in the school curriculum is a topic of debate. This essay will discuss both these views and point out that no matter how important other subjects are, history should be given the top priority.
It is argued that students should focus first and foremost on studying technology and science for several reasons. On a personal level, these kinds of subjects could give a financially comfortable life for those who study them. Because of the increasing demand for manpower who are proficient in these two subjects to develop modern sectors, people themselves are always given numerous job opportunities and career progression. On the societal level, it is considered that technology and science might bring humans economic growth and greater future prosperity. Once choosing to study such subjects, students could therefore create more outstanding innovations which benefit human life.
However, I believe that history should be included in the school curriculum despite the importance of others in this today’s world. Firstly, if history is emphasized as a compulsory subject, it would develop a sense of roots and identity for people from a very young age. To elaborate, there is an educational continuity throughout all generations and walks of life learned from historical events, therefore unifying all people and helping them to comprehend how their forefather’s life and culture has evolved. Secondly, focusing on history might be considered as a way to widen a glimpse of the future. With the implied messages which can be learned from the past, people can avoid bad situations and enhance human life. Fascism, for instance, has shown the aftermath of the evil and therefore ensures that Human rights violations never happen again.
To conclude, people’s opinions differ as to whether History should hold top importance in the school curriculum. With these aforementioned ideas, I do believe that this subject is indispensable.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 78
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... To conclude, people’s opinions differ as to whether History should hold top importance in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87019242128 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4399098161 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313805825775 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999458448541 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761852849714 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20793839139 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639098926532 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.