The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table indicate the amount of poor people in different types of family in Australia in the year 1999.
We can see that 11% of all households, which is almost 2 millions people, were suffered from this condition. The highest number of poverty was from couple with children, with contributed about a half of the total poor people.
There were over one fifth of sole parent who lived in poverty in 1999, which were the highest proportion of all categories. On the one hand, the amount of poverty in single people with no children were also noticeable, with 19% of them suffered from this condition. Couple who had no children, despite having a large number of 211 thousands people who lived in poverty, this figure only accounted for 7% of the total amount of couple with no children.
There were only a small fraction of single aged person (6%) who had financial problems. Meanwhile, the poverty rate in aged couple were even lower, with only 4% of them suffered from this condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Mubashir123 | 11 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-16 | sattar_iust | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 2006
- Smart devices have put all of the world s information at our fingertips What are the drawbacks of this development 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the number of travelers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'indicates'.
Suggestion: indicates
The table indicate the amount of poor people in different ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ple who had no children, despite having a large number of 211 thousands people who lived in pover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76744186047 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42836803962 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2798514848 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905699869783 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522694853261 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658798702472 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774020122863 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744276144937 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.