14.1.2017: In schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts while boys like sciences. What are the reasons for this tendency and do you think this tendency should be changed?
Subject choice is a vital factor in school and university life. These days, there are more and more female students enrolling in art classes while males tend to opt for science subjects. This could be explained by several elements, and I think that it is best not to apply any changes to this tendency.
On the one hand, several reasons explain why students choose different courses at school and tertiary levels. First, the most significant is the natural characteristic of genders, male students are interested in calculating, and analytical abilities to outperform, for example, maths and science. And girls are more emotional and sensitive to have advantages in understanding some subjects relate to the imagination, such as art, and literature. Furthermore, each of the two sexes shows their distinct excellence and strengths in their favored kinds of subjects. As a result, they tend to participate in the classes that suit their capacity.
On the other hand, I think that it should not be altered for some reasons. Initially, the subject choice is their right so adults should force children to study subjects that they do not enjoy. For example, they compel their schoolgirl students to learn sciences instead of literature which leads to bad results and poses big pressure. In addition, the option of the course does not rely on gender. These days, many girls still learn natural grades and boys choose artistic courses. Therefore, letting them be free and making them feel that they are respected and listened to.
In conclusion, the choice of subjects is not related to gender but their innate abilities and preferences. This trend does not harm and should not be changed
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same To what extnet do you agree or disagree 78
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 73
- The bar chart gives information about the food loss and waste at different stages of production in developed and developing countries 70
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09386281588 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68760379694 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581227436823 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7688797634 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244744977595 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738449768167 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674581896548 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153463655867 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660773254617 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.