The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The two given maps compare the road access to a city hospital in two different years: 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that, after 3 years, the road system did not have various changes. In 2010, there were some new constructions built, serving the users of buses and cars.
It is clear that, the Ring road literally remained unchanged during the 3-year period. While the City hospital nearly stayed the same, it only had a small adjustment, a new roundabout was added to its southern region. Although the Hospital road and City road had no change, a second roundabout was built up at their intersection.
In 2010, a new public car park and bus station were constructed to replace the old bus stop system. These two places were located in the east and south-west of the City hospital, respectively. In addition, the old car park for public and staff was torn down and a new staff car park was opened up next to the Hospital road.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 61
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4682723102 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.3774913287 43.030603864 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325077382692 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136459155184 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168408727544 0.0843802449381 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238200402301 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.211154725252 0.0819641961636 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.