The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the present day, face-to-face communication has been gradually replaced by social media. That is increasingly assisting numerous nations in the developing and modernizing. Due to the fact that, people’s life is also quite convenient. Despite of that, some people argue social media may not only make the world unimproved but also make it go down by its disadvantages. From my perspective, the benefits of social media can outweigh the drawbacks. And, this essay below will dicusss and explain the reasons for my points of view.
On the one hand, using social media depends on devices and it affects a lot to the interaction of people in real life. Use it very much can make the users fall prey to online communication abuse. So as the fact that, many individuals could grow egocentric and not have enough the necessary confidence to interact with others face-to-face. For example, there are numerous cases all over the world that some humans chatting on cellphones heavily and then they became an autistic.
On the other hand, there are a number of benefits from using social media like Facebook, Instargram, Tiktok,… The ability to find a variety of news and information on a mobile device or laptop is one of the greatest benefits. Furthermore, social media makes it much simpler for people to keep in touch with our family members wherever they may be. For instance, people can use Messenger to call or message others.
In conclusion, every new technologies has benefits and drawbacks. Howerver, the benefits of it must really great to become popular. As a result, I strongly believe that the benefits can outweigh the drawbacks. And, future improvements will make it possible to help individuals more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace but nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace but nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 36
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... media like Facebook, Instargram, Tiktok,… The ability to find a variety of news a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, really, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04929577465 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84819762593 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5975944207 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3529411765 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259937630327 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754450444947 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845669203247 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147227290376 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807876991431 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... media like Facebook, Instargram, Tiktok,… The ability to find a variety of news a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, really, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04929577465 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84819762593 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5975944207 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3529411765 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259937630327 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754450444947 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845669203247 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147227290376 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807876991431 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.