The bar chart shows the percentage of school chidren learning to play four musical instruments (violin, guitar, piano and drums) in 2005, 2010, 2015.
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of young students who took part in four categories of orchestral instrument classes from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that guitar was the most popular in schools while drum and violin made up the least number of students participating. Additionally, it had an upward trend for both guitar and violin throughout this period.
In 2005, the percentage of students who played guitar was the highest figure at over 10% and higher than younger pianists. Over the next 5 years, the number of young guitar players increased significantly to 20% and reached the peak of the chart at about 27% in 2015. Both piano and guitar accounted for the nearly same percentage, at 6% in 2005. Nearly 3% of learners enjoyed piano classes less than guitar classes and finally at around 2% in the final year.
Both in 2005 and 2010, the number of school children who took part in learning violin and drum had no change at only 6% and 8% respectively. While the violin was at the bottom in 2005, for the next 10 years drum the ranks reverse in 2015 with drum topping violin by a mere 0.5% difference.
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is bteer like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The best way to deal with issues related to traffic and transportation is to encourage people to live in cities instead of suburbs or the countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some young people like to copy the behavior clothes of famous people Why might this be the case What problems might it cause 92
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 79
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertilizer compost 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52895235226 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7540992989 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332974612265 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129120019039 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446722281458 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183582779939 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396705821919 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.