The bar chart shows the percentage of school chidren learning to play four musical instruments (violin, guitar, piano and drums) in 2005, 2010, 2015.
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of young students who took part in four categories of orchestral instrument classes from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that guitar was the most popular in schools while drum and violin made up the least number of students participating. Additionally, it had an upward trend for both guitar and violin throughout this period.
In 2005, the percentage of students who played guitar was the highest figure at over 10% and higher than younger pianists. Over the next 5 years, the number of young guitar players increased significantly to 20% and reached the peak of the chart at about 27% in 2015. Both piano and guitar accounted for the nearly same percentage, at 6% in 2005. Nearly 3% of learners enjoyed piano classes less than guitar classes and finally at around 2% in the final year.
Both in 2005 and 2010, the number of school children who took part in learning violin and drum had no change at only 6% and 8% respectively. While the violin was at the bottom in 2005, for the next 10 years drum the ranks reverse in 2015 with drum topping violin by a mere 0.5% difference.
- Cam 9 test 1 The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 82
- The pie charts show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
- With an increasing number of people eating fast food which if eating to regularly can cause health issues some people think that the only solution is ban it completely To what extent do you agree 84
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 78
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the rate of violent crime in society Do you agree or diagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52895235226 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7540992989 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332974612265 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129120019039 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446722281458 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183582779939 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396705821919 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.