The charts below show the proportion of people’s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and in 2008.
The two pie charts represents how much people spent on various good and services in one European country, between the years 1958 and 2008.
Overall, it is evident that people’s expenditure on housing, food and luxury goods increased over the period shown, while spendings on entertainment, transportation and clothings followed an opposite trend.
In 1958, Clothings took up the largest segment of the total expenditure, which is nearly a third. About a quarter of people’s budget went on housing at 22 per cent. Meanwhile, the figures recorded for transport and entertainment facilities were 13% and 18% respectively, compared to just 7% and 8% spent on food and luxury.
In 2008, Housing became a necessity with an increment of 10% to 32 percentage. Similarly, luxury commodities and food also experienced substantial rise in expenses, with figures reaching to 17% each. However, there was a significant reduction in expenditure for traveling and clothing, as figures dropped to 6% and 12%, while the proportion allocated for refreshments remained relatively stable, with a slight decline from 18% in 1958 to 16% in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-21 | Mhzfohlar | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | Nguyễn Ngọc Bảo Linh | view | |
| 2022-06-23 | Nguyễn Ngọc Bảo Linh | view | |
| 2021-07-25 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
- All parents want the best opportunities for their children There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think having a range of subjects is better for their children s future
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and in 2008 89
- All parents want the best opportunities for their children There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think having a range of subjects is better for their children s future
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The two pie charts represents how much people spent on various good and servic...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35195530726 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10565286882 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687150837989 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5061708985 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186919593197 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687090851839 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667600321263 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109969877064 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746434924663 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.