The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given bar chart depicts one nation’s exports’ values in different categories in 2015 and in 2016. The table illustrates the proportion change that happened in each category of exports in 2016 and comparing it with 2015. Overall, it can be seen from the chart that the earnings from the exporting petroleum products were the highest in both 2015 and 2016. Regarding the table, all the values of exported products had increased in 2016 compared with 2015; however, only the gems and jewellery decreased.
To begin with, the country earned $61 billion from exporting petroleum products in 2015 while in 2016 it had increased to $63 billion. Engineering goods come second, they were exported at $58 billion in 2015, yet, there value raised to $61 billion in 2016. Gems and jewellery were more expensive in 2015 and were sent to other countries at $43 billion whereas in 2016 they experienced a decrease to $41 billion. Agricultural products and textiles were both exported in 2016 with similar higher value at $32 billion; however, in 2015 was $31 billion and $26 respectively.
Moreover, the percentage change in values in four categories had increased except gems and jewellery in 2016. Petroleum products values have raised 3% in 2016 compared with 2015, but engineering goods experienced a dramatic raise at 8.5%. Only 0.81% was the change that happened to agricultural products. In contrast, textile's values dramatically increased at 15.24%. Gems and jewellery value had declined at 5.18%.
- The tables show the forecasted and actual sales of a bicycle shop over four months 78
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out bout the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, well, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 937.175257732 133% => OK
No of words: 243.0 206.0 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11934156379 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79563532918 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460905349794 0.622605031667 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 290.88556701 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.229166628 44.8134815571 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6923076923 76.5299724578 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 16.8248392259 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 4.34317383033 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377920478398 0.216113520407 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174704607578 0.0766984524023 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118586658021 0.0603063233224 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288650282436 0.12726935374 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127317404472 0.0580467560999 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 8.37731958763 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 70.7449484536 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 41.2886597938 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.