The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012
The maps show the changes in the construction of Frenton over a 22 year period between 1990 and 2012.
It is evident that Frenton has experienced a significant development in terms of construction throughout the period, obviously becoming more urbanised and less green.
Starting from the western side of High Street, the only two places that have remained the same in the town were the school and the library. The playing fields east of the school were converted to flats and apartments. Another thing, the tree area down in the southwest were cut down providing space for a
new technopark. Also, a noticeable development is the expansion of the hospital as well as the restaurant which was before a bank.
Moving to the eastern side, firstly, more and more flats were installed on northwest and instead of the housing area. The park and cafe, however, made way for a hotel and a golf course. Lastly, both the theatre and shop region became a cinema and supermarket, respectively.
- Nowadays it is becoming more popular to see animals to be kept in captivity for instance the zoo Do the advantage of keeping animal in the zoo outweigh the disadvantage 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years 78
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...west were cut down providing space for a new technopark. Also, a noticeable devel...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, so, well, another thing, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91017964072 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74006898743 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640718562874 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0402020195 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121648185573 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456078915725 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990080332212 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784244705488 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12240189166 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.