An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
It is mandatory for a doctor to record all his treatments of a medical condition for the benefit of the clinic as we all as the patient. If need be, they can refer to it in the future and resolve conflicts. But there is another use for these records. An ailing patient can access the doctor's previous records of treating similar patients to get more clarity on the condition, to get an idea of what the future holds and instil confidence in the patient. This will help the patient make a decision on whether to be treated by that doctor or not.
By having easy access to previous records the patient can get an idea of what exactly the ailment is and what are it's symptoms. Each record will have a detailed report on the patients symptoms and possible factors that contributed to the medical condition. For example, previous patients of the flu could have various symptoms like cold, cough, and fever and information on how he or she may have contracted it. By viewing these records, a prospective patient can get a high level understanding of the condition and it's symptoms.
Having various perspectives of the treatment of the given medical condition can mentally prepare the patient for the treatment and it's outcome. After reading all previous records, the prospective patient can know what are all the possible treatments for their medical condition and what side effects each of them could have. They will have an idea of it's disadvantages and advantages. For example, taking medicines for a flu may result in insomnia, weight gain or headache in certain people.
Through gaining access to the records, the ailing patient would then be able to take an informed decision on the doctors competency to treat the given medical condition. The prospective patient will have all information regarding the successfull treatments and also the reasons why a treatment may have been unsucessful. With these precedents they can compare their own situation and evaluate whether the doctor will be able to treat their medical condition or not.
These records could have the success rate of the doctor and how competent he is in treating a particular medical condition. All in all I strongly agree that a patient should have access to previous records of the doctor treating a similar patient. This will instill confidence in the patient regarding the doctor's capabilities
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Saket Choudhary | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | shalin63 | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | Jorobe8 | 50 | view |
| 2022-11-19 | Swarnali Swarno | 58 | view |
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 50
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor s record of treating similarly afflicted patients Through gaining such access the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 69
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...ble to take an informed decision on the doctors competency to treat the given medical c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9649122807 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69646698993 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408521303258 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5210522898 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.263157895 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458776709982 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161468339637 0.0831039109588 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117908083305 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309198308749 0.150359130593 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105481713498 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...ble to take an informed decision on the doctors competency to treat the given medical c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9649122807 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69646698993 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408521303258 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5210522898 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.263157895 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458776709982 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161468339637 0.0831039109588 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117908083305 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309198308749 0.150359130593 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105481713498 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.